|
The Samuel Johnson Sound Bite
Page
The Parliamentary Debates
Extracts from The Gentleman's Magazine,
as written by Samuel Johnson
Background | Debates |
Editorial Notes
Background:
Samuel Johnson's retellings of the debates in
Parliament are
an early example of his vivid imagination. Because it was against
the law to print transcriptions of the proceedings, The
Gentleman's Magazine hired someone to hide in the shadows and
jot down skeletal notes, which Johnson transformed into Debates
in the Senate of Lilliput. The sparse nature of the notes meant
that Johnson had to imagine what the speakers actually said,
and drape the notes with the rhetoric which politicians might
use. Johnson's imagination came into play through his efforts to
give each speaker a unique voice.
Because it was illegal to reprint the Debates as if they came
from Parliament, they were hidden in the fictive legislature of
Lilliput, with names which the average Englishman could decode
into their British counterparts. The series was successful, and
considerably boosted the magazine's circulation. Johnson ended
his involvement when he realized that readers mistook his
imagined speeches for the real McCoy: Johnson wanted no part of
an imposture.
Debates:
A debate regarding a petition to the King for the removal of
Sir Robert Walpole, Britain's first "Prime Minister":
- Part I: Walpole has amassed great
power in the Administration due to his closeness to the king and
control over who is awarded places. Lord Carteret charges that
there have been miscarriages in foreign affairs and war due to
positions being held by favorites rather than qualified
officials, and the nation and people have suffered as a result.
Walpole is defended: the charges amount to nothing, because the
what the opposition sees as a crime is merely the impact of
unforeseen conditions, and history is being recalled
inaccurately; the opposition is more interested in power than the
health of the nation. From the July, 1741 Gentleman's Magazine.
- Part II Further arguments on the
justification of the motion against Walpole. Finally, a motion is
proposed, to censure those recommending the King reconsider
taking further advice from Walpole. This motion is considered an
insult by some, but is debated and voted on nonetheless. From the
August, 1741
Gentleman's Magazine.
Editorial Notes:
- I have tried to retain the 18th century feel,
while not hewing too closely to 18th century standards.
I've modernized the capitalization (all nouns began with upper
case characters in the original), and I've changed "long f's" in
words like "dreffed" to s's, reading "dressed." Where printers
used an apostrophe merely to save space in a line (adventur'd) I
have replaced the apostrophe with an 'e'. Other 18th century
spellings and use of italics have been maintained.
- My brief notes (and decoding of the fictional countries and
persons) are in square brackets.
|
|